Monday, 21 November 2011

Vegetation Offset Agreements and the Carbon Tax

Posted by: Scott Thompson

There has been much talk in the media recently about the possibility of primary producers being paid to create a Vegetation Management Offset.  Our own knowledge of primary production would indicate the vast number of primary producers have been undertaking farming and grazing practices for many years which would preserve carbon in soil and vegetation. 
While the idea of Vegetation Management Offsets (where you "lockup" an area to allow the vegetation to return to the status of what is generally called "Remnant Vegetation") is an excellent idea, the problem is that in Queensland there is really no provision in the Vegetation Management legislation which allows for it.  The only relevant provisions allowing for Vegetation Management Offsets are those which relate to areas which are referred to as "high conservation value" or alternatively "vulnerable to land degradation". 
The problem seems to be that the use of those provisions in the legislation would classify land as being of high nature conservation value or vulnerable to land degradation when it is really not country of that type and consequentially that the vegetation map (the PMAV) for the property needs to be altered.  When a grazier does this, is it possible that the PMAV could be totally reclassified either then or in the future (on the basis that the particular ("offset") area had no particular significance and is similar to the remainder of the property)?  Furthermore the only security which can be given involves what we call a "blot on the title" which would undoubtedly affect the value of the property.
What is sorely needed is amendment to the legislation to allow an "ordinary" area of a property (not presently restricted from land clearing or sucker control) to be "preserved" under a Vegetation Offset Agreement (which would allow return to Remnant Vegetation status) without having to classify the area as an area of high conservation value or an area vulnerable to land degradation (when it is really not land in that category), and allowing the PMAV to be altered only in regard to the "offset" area.

Tuesday, 8 November 2011

MS Moonlight Walk

Posted by: Scott Thompson

Anderssens' Team started participating in this community and charitable event in 2011, to raise money for Multiple Sclerosis, to support a team member's mother who suffers from MS.
We have sponsored walkers annually in this event ever since and we strongly recommend everyone participate with their friends and family in such a worthy event.
The evening commences with Star Troopers getting the crowd ready and walkers stretching ready for the leisurely 5km walk.  The Brisbane riverside is transformed into a meandering sea of red lanterns as the crowd of walkers make their way around the river city and back to the South Bank finish line. 
Walkers are welcome home with refreshments and applause from the appreciative MS sufferers at the finish line.
We are proud to participate and raise money for practical assistance aids such as shower re-fits and respite care for those suffering with this disease in our local community each year.

What a Great Team - Ready for MS Moonlight Walk

Charity Events

Posted by: Scott Thompson

News Update - Charity Events

Anderssen Lawyers regularly participates in charity events both to raise money for charity and to be part of a healthier lifestyle.
As one of our clients, if you have an interest in a particular charity or type of sport, why not invite Anderssen Lawyers to take part, or let us know if you would like to be involved in an event in which we are already participating.
We welcome the chance to build great relationships with our clients and one shared event can be all it takes to provide a solid foundation.

Support Staff Breakfast at Merlo

Posted by: Scott Thompson 

Anderssen Lawyers recognises the importance of valuing the work of staff members and in creating a positive and happy work place.
Last month, in October the firm treated the Support Staff to a Coffee Appreciation Breakfast at Merlo to say thank you for their recent outstanding efforts at work.
It also turned into a great team bonding experience and the office was abuzz with conversation about different types of coffee beans and the best methods of making coffee.

Saturday, 5 November 2011

Brisbane to Gold Coast Bike Challenge

Posted by: Scott Thompson

HTM Wilson Bike Challenge Logo
A team of cyclists from Anderssen Lawyers were among approx 8000 cyclists who took part in the Wilson HTM Brisbane to Gold Coast Cycle challenge on Sunday 9 October. It is a 100 kilometre bike ride to raise funds for Diabetes Australia – Queensland and The Heart Foundation.
It was a beautiful day and the team enjoyed a different perspective as they cycled along the Brisbane Busway then through the farmland with fairly flat terrain and minimal traffic, through some industrial and commercial areas and past client property developments before finally glimpsing the coast.
Despite the aches and pains that inevitably come with a 100 kilometre bike ride, the team felt an incredible sense of achievement and the firm is very proud of those that completed the ride and congratulate them on their determination and endurance.

 


Well Done Megan Tilbrook Lawyer - One of our team successfully completing 100km Bike Challenge!
 

 

Friday, 1 July 2011

Lawyer Involvement

Posted by: Scott Thompson

How many times has your lawyer been to your place of work?

Our lawyers frequently visit our clients' businesses, which may be their office, factory or distribution centre, farming venture or development site.
We believe that understanding our clients' businesses and industries is essential to providing sound commercial advice.  We take the time to get to know your business and goals, individual needs and circumstances, and the industry in which you operate. 
So if you would like to experience that level of involvement, understanding and commitment from your lawyer, then it is time for you to give Managing Director, Scott Thompson a call.
Bill Anderssen visiting client, Charlie Hawkins at his property, Herbertvale Station on the Queensland / Northern Territory border
Bill Anderssen visiting client, Charlie Hawkins at his property, Herbertvale Station on the Queensland / Northern Territory border

Saturday, 11 June 2011

Changes to Transfer Duty on Principal Place of Residence

Posted by: Tony Allen

The State Government Budget released on Tuesday 14 June, 2011 includes changes to Transfer Duty on principal places of residence (PPR).  A summary of these changes and has been provided for you below:

Home Concession

Closes 31 July 2011
The Home Concession for transfer duty will end on 31 July 2011. This is the transfer duty concession that people who are not first home buyers receive when buying a home to live in as their principal place of residence. If you are considering buying a home you should carefully consider the transfer duty reforms to help you make an informed decision about the timing of your purchase.

New transfer duty rates

Commence from 1 August 2011
The transfer duty rate structure will be revised to ensure transfer duty payable on a home remains lower in Queensland than under the standard rate in any other mainland state of Australia. If you are considering buying a home you should carefully consider the transfer duty reforms to help you make an informed decision about the timing of your purchase.

First Home Concession and Vacant Land Concession

Continuing but changing from 1 August 2011
First home buyers will continue to receive a First Home Concession on their transfer duty costs. This includes first home buyers purchasing blocks of residential land to build on.
The concession rates have been adjusted to take into account the removal of the Home Concession.

Further Information

Further the concession available to buyers of Principal Place of Residences will no longer be available from 1 August 2011 and new transfer duty rates will apply from that date.

Section 16 and Schedule 2 of the Duties Act 2001 provides that the relevant date for determining liability for transfer duty on agreements for transfer of dutiable property is when the agreement is made.  Accordingly, contracts entered into on or before 31 July 2011 will be charged duty at the current rates whereas contracts entered into on or after 1 August 2011 will be charged at the new duty rates.
Further details of the transfer duty rates and new $10,000 Building Boost that was announced in the Budget on 14 June can be obtained by contacting Tony Allen via email or phone 07 3234 3112 or his assistant Nicola Cini via email or phone 07 3234 3113.

Tuesday, 22 February 2011

What happens when a company Director dies as the Sole Director and Sole Shareholder of the Company?

Posted by: Kylie Wilson

Short Answer

In the vast majority of cases where appropriate planning has not taken place the company becomes "paralysed" sometimes for many months and possibly for some years.

The Problem

The company is governed by its Directors. Directors are appointed by existing Directors or they can be appointed by the shareholders. If there is only one person who is the Sole Director and the sole shareholder of the company and that person dies then unless there are "self-effecting" provisions to the contrary (which do not exist in the vast majority of cases) the company can do nothing until another Director is appointed. If the deceased person left a Will (which was reasonably up to date) and which appoints an Executor, the Executor is still unable to act (on behalf of the Estate of the deceased shareholder) to appoint another Director unt the Executor has obtained a Grant of Probate. We know that approximately 50% of the population have no Will or no up to date Will. In cases where a person dies without a Will ("intestate") then there will need to be a Grant of Letters of Administration taken out generally by a close relative. That person becomes the Administrator. After an Executor obtains a Grant of Probate or an Administrator obtains a Grant of Administration that person would be able on the behalf of the deceased shareholder to appoint a person as Director. That process (of taking out a Grant of Probate or Administration) can take many months. Of course if there is a Will and it is "challenged" then the process of obtaining a Grant of Probate can take some years.

What can the company do in the meantime?

The answer is that the company can do nothing until it has another Director. Of course that can have fairly economic disastrous consequences if the company was carrying on a business or if it was in the process of a transaction at the time of death. The company may not be able to pay wages or its creditors or to conclude a transaction or contract. Its reputation and value may be ruined. Of course the company may have been the trusteee of a Superannuation Fund or the trustee of a Discretionary Trust. In the case of a Discretionary Trust there is sometimes the power residing in the Trust Deed for someone to appoint a different trustee but that of course can also be a difficult process because it involves changing the name of the trustee on all of its assets before it can really act again. In the case of the Superannuation Fund the Trust Deed may but rarely ever does, make provision for a person or persons to have the power to appoint a new trustee in the meantime but in most cases the Superannuation Fund would simply be unable to act and to deal with its assets in any way.

What companies are likely to be affected?

So far we mentioned only the company which has one person as the Sole Director and shareholder but of course it may be that the company is a typical "mum and dad" company. In this case where only one of the spouses dies the other one is likely to be able to continue but of course the company then becomes a Sole Director, sole shareholder company with the same relevant risks; and of course if both "mum and dad" are killed in one accident then we have the same problem.
As mentioned above the company may be a company carrying on a business, it may be a company acting as the trustee of a Superannuation Fund, it may be the trustee of the Discretionary Trust, or it may be a company which has investment property or assets. The problem is widespread and real. So far we have referred only to what happens on death but of course the same problem can occur if the Director loses mental capacity, for example having had a stroke or an onset of Alzheimer's disease or as a result of head injuries, or for that matter serious physical injuriy rendering the person incapapable of conducting his or her business affairs.

What can be done?

The answer lies in careful and exact planning. In the case of a "stand alone" company it involves a combination of ensuring that there is an apppropriate Constitution, appropriate shareholding for the company, and that the person has an up to date Will and enduring Power of Attorney (a combination of documents which have a combination of "self-effecting" provisions). What is important is to ensure that it is not necessary for a Grant of Probate or Administration to be taken out after a person dies before someone can act; or the Guardianship and Administration Tribunal to appoint someone as an Administrator for a disabled person before action can be taken.
It needs to be remembered that an Enduring Power of Attorney lasts only for the lifetime of the person who gives it and "dies" with its donor and (on the other hand) a Will is only activated by the death of the Testator. All of this emphasises the need for a "suite" of documents which allow "self-effecting" mechanisms to occur.
Different lawyers do offer different potential solutions but some of those that we have heard of have not been tested for their efficacy ("ability to do the job"). At Anderssen Lawyers we are constantly looking at issues concerning Estate Planning and problems which need to be dealt with and finding solutions to those problems. It is not appropriate for this publication to endeavour to set out the detail of how it is achieved. That is partly because the method depends on the need. A company which is controlled by an older person who has adult children holding responsible pisitions in life could be provided with an entirely different solution to that which would be provided for a person a generation younger. The trustee company of a Superannuation Fund may be provided with yet a different solution and a company which is the trustee of a Discretionary Trust may have yet another solution.

Superannuation Fund

The extent of the problem mentioned above can be very serious in the case of Superannuation Fund Trustee Companies which are required by law to pay out the deceased member's fund within a limited space of time and where that is not complied with there can be serious taxation consequences. There often seems to be a false assumption that relevant legislation allows an Executor to "step in to the shoes" of the deceased superannuant; but this is not the case. Specific provisions need to be made to allow or give power for a change of Trustee or appointment of new Director.
Furthermore provisions of documents which provide for the decision about who is to control a Superannuation Fund on the death of the superannuants may also give the power to make discretionary decisions about who will receive the proceeds of the Superannuation Fund itself. In these cases the decision is extremely important as to the identity of the persons who should succeed to the control of the fund through the control of the superannuation Trustee Company.
It needs to be remembered that assets in superannuation do not necessarily form part of a deceased person's Estate - although documents can be signed which ensure that the Superannuation Fund is paid to the Estate.

Discretionary Trusts

In the case of Discretionary Trusts what needs to be strongly emphasised is that (as with Superannuation Funds) the assets of the Trust do not necessarily form part of the Estate of the deceased person. Therefore the person who will control the trustee of a Discretionary Trust is an extremely important matter because that person or those persons may well be the persons who have the ability to decide who will share in a distribution of the capital of the trust when it is "vested" ("wound up"). Of course as set out above the Trust Deed itself in the case of Discretionary Trusts as in the case of Superannuation Funds is an extremely important document as part of the suite of provisions which design the succession of control.
It is probably true that the vast majority of Self Managed Superannuation Funds and Discretionary Trusts have no appropriate succession plan in place at all, it is mostly left to chance and often involves most of the assets which the deceased person or persons would have regarded as "theirs" but which (on the contrary) do not necessarily form part of their Estate.
All of this underlines the need for the company which is a Trustee to have self-effecting provisions for passing on a method of control - or at the very least, provisions for how successor Directors can be appointed immediately when the person or persons die (who are the only Directors and shareholders of the company).

Concluding Comment

At Anderssen Lawyers we have spent a great deal of time and effort studyng the problems which exist in these cases and working out appropriate solutions.
Does your current solution have the ability to "do the job"?

Wednesday, 2 February 2011

Every Farmer needs a Succession Plan

Posted by: Scott Thompson

"Having spent almost 10 years involved with rural families as the President of the United Graziers' Association and then AgForce Queensland, I became very conscious of the lack of succession planning throughout the rural community generally, so I set out to change that situation by encouraging individual families to seek some advice.

"In my position I came across plenty of instances of emotional and financial stress at several levels within an extended family that could have been avoided if early assistance and advice had been made available.  Our farming and grazing businesses are critical to our future, so business planning has now become very important to the longer term future, and succession planning should be an essential part of those business plans.

 "I congratulate Bill Anderssen for his initiative in putting together his high quality Rural Succession Planning booklet, and recommend that it be an automatic inclusion in any reading material that is available in rural homes and business houses.  It contains excellent information that should be compulsory reading for all members of the family who are partners or working in the business.

"As "every family needs a farmer", I strongly suggest that every farmer needs a succession plan!"
 
Larry Acton
Past President - Agforce Queensland
Past President - The United Graziers' Association